« March 2008 | Main | June 2008 »

April 28, 2008

New Music: Review - Augustana - "Can't Love, Can't Hurt"

Due on shelves Tuesday, April 29th 2008, Augustanta's Can't Love, Can't Hurt arrives nearly two and a half years after the band's major debut album, All the Stars and Boulevards (2005), which took 19 months to blip on the mainstream radar, thanks in no small part to cameos of the successful single "Boston" on One Tree Hill (CW) and Scrubs (NBC).

Can't Love, Can't Hurt strays little from the band's signature combination of soft, driving rhythms and simple--but meaningful--lyrics, anchored by frontman Dan Layus' sultry piano riffs and intimate vocals, while also exploring a darker, more mature sound that begs not to be taken lightly.

Fans will surely notice a definite refinement of tone and style, along with deeper lyrics ("I ain't gonna make the same mistakes that put my mama in her grave") that hint softly at an effort to squash comparison and classification with Christian Rock groups like Relient K, Waking Ashland, and Switchfoot; Ironically, the original band members migrated from a conservative Christian college town in Illinois to Southern California, fulfilling a wish to (literally) distance themselves from an such an orthodox environment.

Seamlessly blending piano rock with dream-pop, Augustana dares listeners to a contemplate heartfelt, powerful tracks that shift between piano-and-vocals only vignettes of pure, ivory-pounding passion ("Fire") to ballads with hushed country-western influence ("Dust"), a sign that the group's small town, midwestern roots have weathered a migration to San Diego and scores of television appearances--a small piece of history that lends a big hand in shaping the band's future.

Still, despite the band's strength and potential, few tracks lend themselves to the fickle but strict demands of terrestrial radio--and while "Boston" was a success, the second single from their debut album, "All the Stars and Boulevards," flopped.

Time will tell if Can't Love, Can't Hate will again elude widespread popularity, remaining in a secluded but noticeable niche, or if the sophomore effort can parlay Sony/BMG's investment and marketing, banking on the fresh, refined, and less gritty tone that's already shown its strength online (an EP containing three tracks from the album released in February debuted at #2 on the iTunes rock charts).

This time around, a solid, well produced album--released just in time to be a perfect soundtrack to a leisurely, late night drive in spring nights that yearn for summer-- may be true enough to satisfy listeners and still leave them wanting more...

April 06, 2008

Drug Testing Opposition Grows in Flower Mound

FLOWER MOUND, TX -Students at Flower Mound High School participating in any extracurricular activities (and any student with a parking permit) will be given "the privacy of a stall" to provide a urine sample, should they be selected for a random drug test as part of Lewisville ISD's new drug testing program.

In what may be one of the most far-reaching applications of random student drug testing since a divided United States Supreme Court upheld the practice in 2002, Lewisville ISD's new aggressive, $437,787 campaign to combat teen drug use is meant to deter and decrease use, along with providing counseling for students already using illegal drugs, according to the Lewisville ISD.

Led by Daniel Delott, a senior at Flower Mound High School, a growing coalition of students and parents opposed to the testing say the school district's campaign is more like a crusade. Mr. Delott and his supporters have established a website, www.endLISDdrugtesting.com, which has gathered nearly 400 "signatures" for an online petition demanding a withdrawal of the policy, whose ranks increase day-by-day.

"Our school alone has had several students kill themselves under the influence of alcohol. Plenty have died from drunk driving. Drug tests increase alcohol abuse, so putting two and two together...I see a huge safety problem," Mr. Delott said.

The proof, they say, lies in the numbers.

Several major studies--one sampling over 75,000 students nationwide--found drug testing programs have no significant effect on drug use among students--which has been steadily declining in recent years.

In a March 2007 issue of the journal Pediatrics, The American Academy of Pediatrics recommended against drug testing teens at home or school, citing, among other things, a concern that drug tests may lead to increased alcohol abuse.

Students and their parents must sign a consent form authorizing testing if they wish to remain eligible to park at school and participate in anything from chess club to track.

Mr. Delott questioned the school district's sincerity regarding the elimination of drug use among athletes, citing a Powerpoint presentation exhibited to students and parents that outlined the substances to be screened, from marijuana to xanax to heroin, in which there was no mention of steroids.

Beyond numbers, opponents of the policy question its legality. The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

In the 2002 Supreme Court case, the majority found that the Fourth Amendment was not violated because a test among athletes and others involved in extracurricular activities was a "reasonable" balance of privacy rights against the government's interest in drug abuse.

The dissenting minority, voting against allowing school drug testing, cited notable facts: "Nationwide, students who participate in extracurricular activities are significantly less likely to develop substance abuse problems than [their] less involved peers," adding that such policies "invade the privacy of students who need deterrence least, and [risk] steering students at greater risk for substance abuse away from extracurricular involvement that may palliate drug problems."

The heated debate has produced mixed rulings in various state courts; many long, costly legal battles ensnare public policy groups and school districts, as the appeal systems in each state weigh the provisions within their own constitution.

At the heart of a possible legal argument is the requirement that a student requesting a parking permit consent to random drug testing; The Supreme Court's ruling did not authorize testing the general student body, and specifically ruled that a school district's legal right to drug testing is restricted to students involved in extracurricular activities.

An increasing number of lawsuits are being brought before state courts challenging similar policies under state law. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court struck down a school district's drug testing policy there, citing the state constitution protected students from a test without any probable cause. Last month, the Washington State Supreme Court unanimously ruled that random drug tests are unconstitutional, again citing the state constitution.

Though Mr. Delott has acknowledged the possibility of a lawsuit, he stated it would only be considered as a last resort. The matter has not been argued before the Texas Supreme Court. The most recent ruling before a State Court of Law in 2003 upheld drug testing programs; the decision was never appealed.

Social networking sites like Facebook and Myspace are rife with criticism regarding the district's policies, and many students are actively speaking out on the internet, creating groups to deliver news and information and organize students from several campuses. One student is reportedly distributing anti-testing stickers throughout schools in the district, and plans to continue doing so.

Ironically, the fundamental catalyst fueling the increasingly frustrated opposition--communication--is also what Mr. Delott believes is most important to truly address the issue of drug abuse.

"If [they're] spending time, money, and effort on our drug issue, I believe it's communication that will yield the best results without torturing students and insulting their parents. I don't know anyone who would protest a communicative approach to preventing and dealing with drugs in our schools."

When asked about the group's continuing efforts and plans for future courses of action, Mr. Delott replied, "we're just getting started."

Messages left with public relations staff for the Lewisville ISD seeking comment on the petition were not immediately returned.

April 02, 2008

How Secure is S4?

First reported by the Dallas Voice in an article published February 29th, the evolving accusations of a single man against a corporation that holds a financially valuable and politically influential strip of land here continues to develop, as owners of the popular gay nightclub Station 4 continue to deny claims made by Sid Gonzales that he was assaulted near the dance floor.

Mr. Gonzales admitted to being under the influence of alcohol--"buzzed," as he told The Voice--when he reportedly approached two young men and a woman and attempted to make conversation; When he reached out to offer a handshake, he stated that his wrist was twisted, broken and stabbed with an unknown object, and kicked or otherwise struck on his back, leaving bruises.

Mr. Gonzales said he then notified bar staff and front desk personnel, but left the club after he was unable to locate security. Despite admitting to being slightly affected by alcohol consumption, and his serious allegations of aggravated assault, Mr. Gonzales did not seek medical attention until the next morning, when he awoke to swelling and pain in his wrist. He filed a report with the Dallas Police Department, claiming the assault was a hate crime.

In an initial response to The Voice regarding the incident, Rick Espaillat, a spokesperson for Caven Enterprises, the parent company of Station 4, stated Mr. Gonzales was unable to locate security because staff were responding to other incidents -- which occurred at the same time involving "the same suspects."

Later Mr. Espaillat, in another article published by The Voice, vehemently denied the assault occurred at all, despite an earlier statement in which he said that the three suspects allegedly involved were evicted from the club by security.

A police investigator assigned to the case stated that he has found no evidence to corroborate Mr. Gonzales' claims after interviewing club staff and management, but had not viewed any security video surveillance tapes from the night of the incident.

Defending accusations that his claims are without merit and, according to Caven Enterprises "an insult to the integrity of our organization," Mr. Gonzales told The Voice he has been a patron at Station 4 for "over twenty years," and had nothing to gain by making false statements to the police about an attack.

Mr. Espaillat and corporate representatives from Caven Enterprises have been reluctant to respond to media inquiries and disclose any information regarding the video surveillance footage.

A recent visit to Station 4 between the hours of approximately 10:00 p.m. and midnight on a Friday night found a lively club with a mixed crowd of assorted ages and ethnic backgrounds. Scores of people crowded the dance floor lit by swirling lights, strobes, contrasted with periods of darkness between songs--making it difficult to see the premises clearly.

Despite a thorough, constant patrol of the club's upper level, which overlooks the main dance floor, several sweeps on the main dance floor, and visual observations of the patio and billiard areas, only one security officer was noticed: seen from the outdoor balcony on the street entrance below, casually leaning against a tree while apparently talking on his cell phone.

An investigation of known incident reports filed with the Dallas Police Department from March 2007 to the present day found over a dozen incidents associated with Station 4, ranging from stolen purses, wallets, a person struck by a motor vehicle in front of the club, vandalized cars and robbery to a man who was wounded by a box cutter in front of the club premises. The number of similar incidents that occur but go unreported is unknown.

An analysis of known calls made to the 911 emergency dispatch center found that in the same period of time, almost 40 calls were made from or in reference to Station 4; Twelve of those calls were initiated from Station 4 staff, security, or management.

Security--be it perceived or real--is a sensitive issue for club owners and patrons alike; one incident can cripple a venue's reputation, sending people--and their money--elsewhere.

Club management and public relations personnel are particularly sensitive to inquiries from the media, well aware of sensationalism many press outlets seek to seize. Caven Enterprises did not respond to an e-mail seeking comment regarding the incident reports and 911 calls.

The Lizard Lounge, which features similar dance areas, was among a handful of similar nightclubs that also did not return calls seeking comment regarding their safety precautions and records.

A visit to The Lizard lounge revealed strict scrutiny of identification (on most nights, the club is open to persons 18 years of age or older) and several heavily built bouncers keeping watch over the main dance floor and areas above. Patrons interviewed claimed exterior and interior police presence on some nights (police were not present on the date of an investigative visit.)

Public records indicate that Lizard Lounge, while larger and arguably more frequented, has approximately the same number of police reports filed as Station 4 in the past year, though none were of a violent nature. A majority of the reports involved theft from vehicles in a parking lot or on the street near Lizard Lounge premises.

An analysis of known calls made to the 911 emergency dispatch center regarding The Lizard Lounge yielded a total of 26 calls; Only three were initiated by Lizard Lounge staff.

The perception of being in a safe environment is not influenced solely by a heavily visible security presence. Instead, a combination of word-of-mouth chatter, internet banter, appearance, and advertisement influence where many go for a night out on the town, regardless of their sexuality.

Many patrons interviewed within Station 4, who said they had heard of the assault claims made by Mr. Gonzales, said they felt staff did a proper job keeping the club safe, and were unsure of whether Mr. Gonzales was injured at Station 4.

"I wasn't there, so how should I know?," quipped one.